Roger Ascham

The Scholemaster

[Auszug]

The trew difference of Authors is best knowne, per diuersa genera dicendi, that euerie one vsed. And therfore here I will deuide genus dicendi, not into these three, Tenue, mediocre, et grande, but as the matter of euerie Author requireth, as

in Genus: Poeticum,
   Historicum,
   Philosophicum,
   Oratorium.

These differre one from an other, in choice of wordes, in framyng of Sentences, in handling of Argumentes, and vse of right forme, figure, and number, proper and fitte for euerie matter, and euerie one of these is diuerse also in it selfe, as the first.

Poeticum, in: Comicum,
   Tragicum,
   Epicum,
   Melicum.

Druckvorlage

Elizabethan Critical Essays.
Edited with an Introduction by Gregory Smith.
Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1904.
Text: S. 23; Kommentar: S. 354.
Smith folgt dem Erstdruck von 1570.

URL: https://archive.org/details/elizabethancriti0001ggre

Editionsrichtlinien.

Erstdruck

The scholemaster or plaine and perfite way of teachyng children, to vnderstand, write, and speake, the Latin tong: but specially purposed for the priuate brynging vp of youth in ientlemen and noble mens houses, and commodious also for all such, as haue forgot the Latin tonge ... By Roger Ascham.
An. 1570. At London: Printed by Iohn Daye.

Literatur

Bates, Catherine (Hrsg.): A Companion to Renaissance Poetry. Hoboken, NJ 2018.

Bates, Catherine / Cheney, Patrick (Hrsg.): The Oxford History of Poetry in English. Volume 4: Sixteenth-Century British Poetry. Oxford 2022.

Berensmeyer, Ingo (Hrsg.): Handbook of English Renaissance Literature. Berlin 2019.

Brandmeyer, Rudolf: Poetiken der Lyrik: Von der Normpoetik zur Autorenpoetik. In: Handbuch Lyrik. Theorie, Analyse, Geschichte. Hrsg. von Dieter Lamping. 2. Aufl. Stuttgart 2016, S. 2-15.

Buck, August u.a. (Hrsg.): Dichtungslehren der Romania aus der Zeit der Renaissance und des Barock. Frankfurt a.M. 1972 (= Dokumente zur europäischen Poetik, 3).

Cheney, Patrick / Hardie, Philip (Hrsg.): The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature. Bd. 2: 1558-1660. Oxford 2015.

Dubrow, Heather: The Challenges of Orpheus. Lyric Poetry and Early Modern England. Baltimore 2008.

Goldstein, R. James: The English Lyric Tradition. Reading Poetic Masterpieces of the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Jefferson, North Carolina 2017.
Kap. 2: What Was a Lyric Poem?

Greene, Roland: The lyric. In: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Bd. 3: The Renaissance. Hrsg. von Glyn P. Norton. Cambridge u.a. 1999, S. 216-228.

Kinney, Arthur F.: The Position of Poetry: Making and Defending Renaissance Poetics. In: A New Companion to English Renaissance Literature and Culture. Hrsg. von Michael Hattaway. Bd. II. Chichester, U.K u. Malden, Mass 2010, S. 16-27.

Lamb, Julian: Rules of Use. Language and Instruction in Early Modern England. London u.a. 2014.

Mauduit, Christine u.a. (Hrsg.): Brill's Companion to the Reception of Aristotle's Poetics. Leiden u. Boston 2025.

Ord, Melanie: Classical and Contemporary Italy in Roger Ascham's The Scholemaster (1570). In: Renaissance Studies 16.2 (2002), S. 202-216.

Plett, Heinrich F.: Rhetoric and Renaissance Culture. Berlin 2004.
S. 152-177: Dispositio Poetica. The Rhetorical Conceptualization of Poetic Genres.

Rodriguez, Antonio (Hrsg.): Dictionnaire du lyrique. Poésie, arts, médias. Paris 2024.

Roe, John: Theories of Literary Kinds. In: A New Companion to English Renaissance Literature and Culture. Hrsg. von Michael Hattaway. Bd. 2. Malden, Mass. u.a. 2010, S. 3-14.

Russell, William: Inventing the Critic in Renaissance England. Newark 2020.

Zymner, Rüdiger (Hrsg.): Handbuch Gattungstheorie. Stuttgart u. Weimar 2010.

Edition
Lyriktheorie » R. Brandmeyer